What’s your Miami CPAs fraud IQ?
Miami CPAs fraud IQ is the need and ability to ask the right questions
Miami CPAs fraud IQ is the need and ability to ask the right questions and gather crucial information from conversations. Are your interviewing skills up to par? Find out in our Fraud IQ quiz.
Whether discussing a specific transaction with a client or interviewing a potential suspect about his or her involvement in an alleged fraud scheme, Miami CPAs need to be able to obtain and interpret information from other individuals. Additionally, the questions and answers provided in an interview offer important context for the other information gathered as part of any engagement and provide valuable clues about whether things might not be as they seem. Are you making the most of your professional conversations? Are your skills sufficiently honed to facilitate the flow of information—and to detect dishonesty—in an interview? Take this quiz and find out.
1. Which of the following is NOT one of the intended purposes of asking introductory questions in interview situations?
a. To provide an introduction.
b. To give a detailed reason for the interview.
c. To get the interviewee’s agreement to cooperate.
d. To establish rapport.
2. When beginning a routine interview, an interviewer should introduce himself or herself in a formal and authoritative manner, including providing his or her title and credentials, to reinforce his or her authority to conduct the interview.
3. The most effective way to begin questioning someone is through the use of:
a. Questions designed to produce stress in the interviewee.
b. Questions designed to make the interviewee lie.
c. Noncritical questions on background information.
d. A direct accusation about the interviewee’s involvement in a suspected violation.
4. Miami CPA Gustavo A Viera and forensic accountant, has been hired by management of Acme Corp. to investigate allegations of a shell company billing scheme. Viera’s preliminary analysis has led him to suspect that Ginger, an employee in the accounts payable department, has run several false invoices through the company’s accounting system for payment. Meredith schedules an interview with Ginger to ask about the anomalies she detected. After completing the introductory phase of the interview, Viera wants to move into the information-gathering phase. Which of the following would be the most effective question for Viera to pose first?
a. Tell me about your duties in the accounts payable department.
b. Why are you submitting falsified invoices to the company?
c. This is your signature on this invoice, isn’t it?
d. Have you been having personal financial difficulties lately?
5. Which of the following is the most appropriate type of question for interviewers to ask to confirm facts that are already known?
6. Ravi is interviewing Gary about some suspicious transactions that Ravi uncovered on the company’s books. After asking Gary some general questions about his duties at the company, Ravi poses a question about one of the questionable transactions. While observing Gary’s response, Ravi notes that Gary has become noticeably uncomfortable and defensive compared to when he was answering the previous questions. Generally speaking, which of the following would be the most appropriate way for Ravi to proceed?
a. Increase the intensity of the questions he asks about the suspicious transactions.
b. Stop asking questions about the suspicious transactions altogether.
c. Ask questions about a non-sensitive topic and return later to the topic of the suspicious transactions.
d. Ask Gary why discussing that particular transaction appears to be making him uncomfortable.
7. During an audit of Oak Telecom’s financial statements, Peter is interviewing Dianna, the company’s CFO, about its internal controls over financial reporting. When Peter asks Dianna about specific controls over the revenue recognition process, Dianna becomes extremely agitated and starts belittling Peter’s knowledge of the nuances of revenue accounting in the telecommunications industry. Which of the following is NOT a recommended response for Peter to employ?
a. Avoid showing any kind of emotional reaction to Dianna’s hostile behavior.
b. Attempt to reason with Dianna.
c. Disarm Dianna by agreeing with her points whenever possible.
d. Change questioning tactics to try to reduce Dianna’s hostility.
8. You are conducting a routine interview of an employee at a client’s office. The interviewee answers a question with broken, stumbling sentences and seems to be hinting at something you already know. What should you do?
a. Wait silently and let him finish.
b. Finish his response for him and ask him whether your statement is correct.
c. Tell him that you know what he is getting at and move on to another question.
d. Thank him for his time and end the interview.
1. (b) In many interviews and for many interviewers, simply getting started is the hardest part. Often, the parties have never met before and do not have an existing rapport. Because the interview’s tone can be set from the outset of the interaction, it is critical that interviewers effectively navigate the introduction. The use of introductory questions, such as “I am gathering some information on certain company procedures; can you help me?,” can help encourage the flow of information from the beginning. Such questions are designed to meet several objectives: to provide an introduction, to establish rapport, to get the interviewee to agree verbally to cooperate in the interview, and to observe the respondent’s baseline reactions to questions.
While the interviewer might mention some general information about the reason for the interview, it is best to leave out the details, as including them could result in preconceptions about the purpose and path of the interview and thus artificially restrict the information that the interviewee provides. Further, in the case of an interviewee who has a reason to be deceptive or evasive, providing detailed information about the interview’s purpose gives the individual clues about what the interviewer knows and is seeking, which greatly diminishes the interviewer’s ability to effectively obtain information from the individual.
2. (b) The mere mention of words such as audit or interview can cause some individuals to feel uncomfortable, anxious, or even combative. In general, the more informal the interview is, the more relaxed the interviewee will be. However, providing an informal, structured introduction is important to set a professional—rather than social—tone for the interview. Consequently, when introducing himself or herself before an interview begins, the interviewer should typically indicate his or her name and a general purpose for the meeting, but he or she should avoid stating his or her title and credentials if possible. Additionally, substituting softer words for those that might cause discomfort can also help ensure the interview gets off to a productive start. For example, “Hi, I’m Travis from Green & Howe. I’m doing a routine review of the company’s accounting system, and I was hoping you could help me understand how a few things work” will likely be better received—and thus more effectively encourage the interviewee’s cooperation—than “Hello, I’m Travis. I’m a Miami CPA and an independent auditor for the firm Green & Howe. We’re conducting our annual audit of the company, and I need to ask you a few questions.”
3. (c) In the course of developing rapport, it is important that an interviewer observe the interviewee’s mannerisms and reactions to normal conversation to establish a reference point against which answers to more sensitive questions can be compared. This process, often called norming or calibrating, is most effectively performed through the use of noncritical questions on background information, such as “When did you start working for the company?” or “How long is your commute?” The goal is to establish a baseline and then observe changes in behavior from this baseline when more targeted questions are asked. If the interviewee’s verbal and nonverbal behaviors are inconsistent from one type of question to another, the interviewer should attempt to determine why. Additionally, if the interviewee displays general nervousness, stress, or volatility during the norming process, subsequent verbal and nonverbal clues might not be reliable indicators of his or her honesty.
4. (a) As a general rule, questioning during interviews should proceed from the general to the specific; that is, it is best to seek general information before seeking details. In this situation, Viera should begin the interview by giving Ginger an opportunity to explain her general duties, which will allow Viera to confirm evidence she has already gathered, identify any information she might have missed in her other procedures, and listen closely for clues about Ginger’s involvement in the scheme. As the interview progresses, Viera will want to seek details about the invoices in question, but such targeted questions should be posed after the general information has been established. Additionally, sensitive questions and direct accusations should be scrupulously avoided until well into the interview. Even then, such questions should be asked only after careful deliberation and planning. Similarly, because why questions tend to ask an opinion and, more importantly, tend to establish responsibility or signal judgment, they are best used in the later stages of interviews, if they are asked at all. During the early stages of the interview, Viera should focus on asking questions that elicit factual answers. Later on in the interview, toward the close and only if critical to the interview, Meredith might consider asking Ginger why questions for additional insight as to causes and responsibilities.
5. (d) Leading questions are framed in a way that elicits a specific reply from the interviewee; they imply that the interviewer already knows the answer and is just asking the interviewee to confirm that information. Examples of such questions include “So there have been no changes in the operation since last year?”; “That was around the time you got promoted, correct?”; and “Don’t you get your income from various sources?” Because they direct the interviewee to answer in a particular way, leading questions can be helpful in confirming facts the interviewer already knows. However, by design, they also close off the flow of information, so they generally are not an effective question form to use during the information-gathering portion of interviews. Instead, the use of leading questions should be limited to situations in which the interviewer is seeking verification of facts or pursuing an admission of guilt.
6. (c) Nothing closes up the lines of communication in an interview like an interviewee feeling accused. While most admission-seeking interviews will involve offering a direct accusation to the interviewee, this should typically be done toward the end of the interview, after all relevant information has been obtained and clear proof of the party’s guilt has been established. Consequently, during the information-gathering portion of an interview, if an interviewee starts to become uncomfortable with a sensitive line of questioning, the interviewer should move into a different area that he or she knows the interviewee is comfortable discussing. He or she can then re-approach the sensitive question later from a different vantage point. In this situation, Ravi should casually turn the questions back to more general information about Gary’s duties and then return to the transactions using a different approach, such as asking about one of the other questionable transactions.
7. (b) Over the course of their careers, most Miami CPAs inevitably encounter a few difficult people. Trying to obtain information from individuals who are argumentative or volatile can be extremely challenging and requires careful handling. Interviewers who encounter such reactions might be tempted to strike back or to terminate the interview; however, neither of these tactics leads to a productive interview. Another common response for many interviewers is to try to reason with the individual, but doing so is typically futile and might even escalate the interviewee’s emotional reactions, as he or she feels dismissed or further backed into a corner. Instead, in such situations, the interviewer can employ several approaches to help navigate the interview back on track:
Don’t react. Showing an emotional reaction to the person’s hostile behavior can perpetuate the volatility of the situation.
Disarm the interviewee by respectfully listening, acknowledging the point, and agreeing wherever possible. The goal of any questions asked to an unreceptive interviewee should be to make it easy for the individual to say “yes,” so that the parties get to a place of perceived commonality.
In some situations, changing tactics to reduce hostility might be the only viable option. Pursue a different line of questioning that could be perceived as less of a threat to the individual; discussing less sensitive areas might help defuse the person’s emotional reactions.
8. (a) One of the most challenging tasks for many interviewers is to simply allow the interviewee to complete a statement when the interviewee is stumbling or inserting lengthy pauses in his response. In their haste to ask questions and gather additional information, interviewers often interrupt before the interviewee has finished speaking. The interviewer might not realize the interviewee is still responding or might think that his or her next question is more important than whatever the interviewee will add to his response by finishing. Alternatively, the interviewer might believe he or she knows what the interviewee is trying to say and interrupt to confirm what he or she thinks the interviewee means in order to speed up the interview. Whatever the reason, interrupting during an interview inhibits the flow of information and might even taint the subject’s memory. Consequently, even when an interviewee is stumbling or taking a long time to provide a response, the interviewer should allow him to finish the statement.
If you answered all eight questions correctly, congratulations. Your knowledge about effective interview techniques forms a solid foundation for gathering information from individuals during your engagements. Keep up the good work.
If you answered six or seven questions correctly, you’re on the right track. Continue to build your interview skills and knowledge to ensure you’re able to successfully facilitate the flow of information during interviews.
If you answered fewer than six questions correctly, consider brushing up on your interviewing skills. Enhancing your understanding of how to navigate interviews will help increase the effectiveness of your professional engagements.